“The reported combination of blood clots and low blood platelets is very rare,†the agency noted, “and the overall benefits of the vaccine in preventing COVID-19 outweigh the risks of side effects.â€.
The conclusion follows weeks of drama around the vaccine, in which more than a dozen countries that had already authorized the vaccine’s use abruptly halted vaccinations out of concern for the blood clots—then resumed use out of concerns for the spread of COVID-19.And on Tuesday, the University of Oxford, which co-developed the vaccine with AstraZeneca, said that it had paused a small UK trial of the vaccine in children and teenagers.
In the latest misstep, the company got into a highly unusual and concerning spat with a panel of US experts tasked with overseeing its COVID-19 vaccine trial and data.
And it’s also likely to cast a shadow over the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, which is authorized in the US and elsewhere and uses the same design as AstraZeneca’s vaccine.
Still, the side effects seen in AstraZeneca’s vaccine raise worries about Johnson & Johnson’s.During the clinical trials of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, there was an early sign of an increased risk of these blood-clotting conditions in vaccinated people, Peter Arlett, head of data analytics at the EMA, said in a press briefing Wednesday.
Of the approximately 4.5 million people who have received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine worldwide, there have been three reported cases of blood-clotting events similar to those seen in people given the AstraZeneca vaccine, Arlett said.