The amendments specified that countries could seek compulsory licensing — a way for a government to waive intellectual property rights without the patent owner’s consent — in cases of national or other extreme emergencies.
The WTO’s action set a precedent, said Yuan Qiong Hu, legal adviser for the Doctors Without Borders Access Campaign, which is advocating for the WTO coronavirus waiver.That’s also why Mustaqeem De Gama, an intellectual property expert and South Africa’s WTO representative, said it’s time for the global trade agency to act to ensure that “inappropriate use of intellectual property†doesn’t lead to “an artificial scarcity of supply.â€.TRIPS, he said, recognizes that every country has the right “to ensure that its citizens have access to necessary medicines, equipment and technology that will address covid-19.†He said a WTO waiver would reinforce that principle and allow countries to prepare to kick-start their own production rather than having to wait until richer countries fill their vaccine orders first.But De Gama said that fact alone presents an incomplete picture of the pandemic’s impact on people in countries without adequate medical resources or government relief during the pandemic.
Fidler, however, disagreed that intellectual property rights represent an immediate impediment to vaccine accessBut he said the WTO impasse remains worrying because it could push developing countries closer to the brink while further eroding U.S