Then, in 2005, Brown and his team detected another object in the Kuiper Belt, one that was much bigger than Pluto.
“After we discovered Eris, and realized that Eris is more massive than Pluto, you’ve got to do something,†Brown told the BBC in July.Rightly suspecting there were more planet-like objects out there in the Kuiper Belt, he appealed to the Paris-based International Astronomical Union, the leading association for astronomers and other planetary scientists, to reconsider the definition of “planet†in order to prevent the accepted list from growing by dozens or more—an expansion Brown at the time described as “ridiculous.â€.
“I think the IAU’s demotion of Pluto was questionable,†Steve Maran, a former NASA astrophysicist, told The Daily Beast.“I think that Pluto as an example of a large Kuiper Belt object is so much more interesting than Pluto as this very weird planet at the outer edge of the solar system, unlike anything else,†Brown told Space.com in 2010.Brown told The Daily Beast recently that he hasn’t changed his mind about Pluto.Brown has certainly moved on—to another something spinning along the Kuiper Belt that he thinks is more deserving of planetary status than Pluto.Caltech astronomer Mike Brown briefs the media about a potential ninth planet.Their complaint is that lots of objects out there in the Kuiper Belt also warrant the label—just like Pluto.